Simran Controversy: Writer Sameer Gautam Accuses Apurva Asrani Of Stealing Credits For Shahid, Labels Him A Hypocrite

Apurva Asrani had called out Kangana Ranaut for claiming that she wrote Simran and now a former collaborator of his, Sameer Gautam, has accused him of stealing his writing credits for the National Award winning film Shahid

13957 Reads |  

Simran Controversy: Writer Sameer Gautam Accuses Apurva Asrani Of Stealing Credits For Shahid, Labels Him A Hypocrite

Apurva Asrani had spoken out against Simran star Kangana Ranaut and director Hansal Mehta after the actress was given a writing credit in the film’s poster.

In a viral Facebook post, Asrani had written: “It is demeaning for any writers name to be pushed after an additional writing credit, I want to bring to your attention that it's not the 'credits' that irk me so much. There is something bigger that I notice, something that I cannot make sense of. Ms Ranaut has been claiming in several interviews that Hansal Mehta, the director of Simran, approached her with just a one line screenplay of the film. She says that they story was dark & gritty thriller at that stage and that she herself developed it into a light, fun film.This completely discredits me and my efforts, and I have to call out this lie.”

simran movie poster featuring kangana ranaut
Image Source: twitter/T-Series

And now the tables have been turned against Apurva, in another Facebook post.

Sameer Gautam, the writer of Jalpari (2012), has claimed that he is the original writer of the National Award Winning film Shahid and Apurva simply usurped his writing credits.

Image Source: facebook/sameer.roy

Here is the full post:

“This is a personal rant so please do not get irked by the heavy usage of “I” in the story. It is based on a true story just like the film Shahid. So, where do I start?

Let me start by saying that I am the writer of Shahid that no one in the industry knows about except my team and my Director. You all know of Apurva Asrani as the writer of Shahid. Am I right?

From the first day of my research where I did not even have Shahid Azmi’s address to the final shooting script and till the end of production, after which I also worked on the subtitles for the film’s festival cut.

Apurva Asrani joined early as an editor and I had tremendous respect for him. Here was a man so humble, so friendly and with such stellar work, the editor of the great seminal film Satya in his repertoire. It made me believe in cinema more, it reminded me why we do what we do.

Now let me talk about why I left Delhi (where I had a career) and joined this industry where as they say, "money talks and bullshit walks." A business where we are constantly selling and nobody gives a crap about reflecting human dignity. One man cared though. That man is Hansal Mehta; I call him Sir. I haven’t in my life called a lot of people Sir. Only 2 and Hansal Sir is second in that list, the first being my mentor back in Delhi, his name is Sameer Hans (irrelevant in this case, sorry Sir and anyways you are not on Facebook.)

So now coming back to the point of this post, Shahid was written, shot and Apurva was now editing it. During which Apurva referred me to Nila Madhab Panda, for a film titled Jalpari. This was a wonderful gesture from Apurva’s side and my respect for him was at its peak. Deepak Venkatesha was the screenplay writer of the film.

A few weeks later, when I came back to Mumbai and met Hansal Sir, the festival cut was ready. We worked on the subtitles for the festival cut and by Gods grace, our film was selected in TIFF, just to let you know, I was supposed to have a “Written By” credit then.

One day, not much later, I got to know from a team member that Apurva is insisting on a screenwriting credit for the film. Sir was happy with this cut and he then spoke to me about this. At first, I did not know what to say and then I said "No!" because I had given the film 4 years of my life with nothing but that to show for it. Apurva kept at it and refused to work any further unless he was given a Screenplay credit for Editing this 'Fresh approach/ Narrative' to the film. Hansal Sir was in a Catch 22 situation and I could see it. It was difficult for him. He did not want to lose either of us. As much as he fought for me, he finally gave in to Apurva's demands and agreed to give him the credit. Hansal Sir felt sorry towards me, but I was clear that I will not continue to work for/ with him if he has Apurva in his team from thereon. It was difficult but jo sahi hai, usmein sochna kya?(If it's right, there's nothing left to think!). I come from small town in India, that's just how we're made.

Hansal Sir and I attempted to write a few times before and after Shahid’s release, but it did not work out. After which he got busy with Citylights. I too, was working on a script. We soon lost touch. I tried to get work but everywhere I went people asked me if I was the real writer of Shahid. I also have a shortcoming, I must disclose it. I have a fair idea about what I want in a story and am a little strong headed when it comes to this. So, obviously things did not materialize with most industry folk. I am not even a charmer like Apurva. It was a struggle to prove yourself against a man with a better face recall. He had hijacked the credit and positioned himself as the writer from the time it got screened in MAMI. I was not there and it is my fault. I was attending to my ailing mother in Delhi and I had to be there.

Now, you may ask me why I kept quiet? I don’t know. But people from nondescript small towns like me will connect with this. We have nothing from where we come. We have this quiet arrogance about ourselves because we don’t bullshit our way up. We are passionate and we work hard to be good at whatever we do. A credit monger can take away your credit but how can he or she take your ability away. So, I left it at that.

Why Speak now? Though what is happening is not astounding for me because I am a Cinephile, the sheer magnitude of this hypocrisy is nauseating. Calling Hansal Mehta to show spine?... Huhh... Well, tell me a Director in the last 5 years who has done more in India for the voiceless Indian. You know what; I call that “Spine”. Unwavering and risking everything to show the plight of the voiceless human existence. Questioning our blind and often ancient logic by which we look at our lives, comprehend it. He is a humanist. If that is not showing spine than I don’t know what it really means.

Being an insider, I know I am not the only one Mr. Asrani has stepped over. He is a regular offender. Writers and Editors please make note. This man is bad news. I urge the people supporting Mr. Asrani to show the same support to me. I know nothing apart from what Mr. Asrani has said about the wrong committed against him and I'm sure you may have strong opinions about what really happened there, but this is what I have faced.

You know my story now. You tell me what's right.”

Post this, SpotboyE contacted Apurva Asrani and this is what he had to say, “I don’t know why we are bringing Shahid up right now. We are talking about Simran and Shahid is a 4-5 year old story which must be discussed at another time. Digging out a 5 year old story right now is diluting the entire issue. It must be discussed with the director who decided the script. Any questions about credits of Shahid should go to Hansal Mehta and not to me.”

Thumbnail Image Source: twitter/UTV & silverscreen