The White Tiger Court Case: Sonia Mudbhatkal Fail To Appear For The Hearing After Accusing Makers Of Priyanka Chopra Starrer Of Copyright Violation
Sonia Mudbhatkal had accused the makers of The White Tiger of copyright violation. The court was to hold a second hearing in the matter yesterday, but neither Sonia nor her lawyer appeared in the court
A day before the release of Priyanka Chopra-Rajkummar Rao starrer The White Tiger, a stay was asked upon by Sonia Mudbhatkal but the court had dismissed the claims by calling it unjustified. The plaintiffs had requested another hearing, which was slated for Feb 11 2021 but failed to appear in the court.
The Delhi High Court had heard an urgent petition filed by Sonia Mudbhatkal seeking a stay on the film's streaming on grounds of alleged copyright violation.
In the last hearing that urgently started at 7 pm a day before the film’s release, a single bench of Justice C Harishankar held that no prima facie material was shown to justify a last minute grant of injunction against the respondents. As the proceedings went by, the court stated that “Why should I not take... that this is not an open and shut case of blackmail?"
If you think I am going to give you relief without placing any of these on record, you are badly mistaken. Why should I not take... that this is not an open and shut case of blackmail?: Court#WhiteTiger#DelhiHighCourt
— Bar & Bench (@barandbench) January 21, 2021
Distraught over perceiving the court lightly, without having any substantial grounds to seek a stay on the release just 24 hours before its release, the court also stated, “Don't blame corona for everything. You are aware from 2019..for a half baked story, you want the court to give you an interim injunction? I am not convinced. There is absolutely nothing."
Don't blame corona for everything. You are aware from 2019..for a half baked story, you want the court to give you an interim injunction? I am not convinced. There is absolutely nothing: Court#WhiteTiger#DelhiHighCourt
— Bar & Bench (@barandbench) January 21, 2021
Plaintiff’s advocate Kapil Sankhla also prayed the Court for 24 hours to get the documents and protect them for the period. And, Justice Hari Shankar flatly refused the prayer: “I will not protect you for 24 minutes, forget about hours”. Yet, there was another hearing date that was given for 11th February, 2020 where Sonia and her representative lawyers did not turn up.
Sankhla urges Court for 24 hours to get the documents.
— Bar & Bench (@barandbench) January 21, 2021
I (Hart) am in America: Adv Sankhla
You remain there: Court
Protect me for 24 hours: Sankhla
I will not protect you for 24 minutes, forget about hours: Court #WhiteTiger#DelhiHighCourt
In the order passed by the hon’ble court, refusing to put a stay on the release, the court stated, “There is no material on record to justify the plaintiffs approaching this court less than 24 hours prior to release seeking stay..It is settled ... that any party approaching court at the end hour, seeking interlocutory indirection against the release of cinematographic film, is disentitled to any such relief.”
A source from the court premises and close to the matter shares, “The plaintiff in this matter is known to knock the doors of the court in short notice, even in past matters. It is a pattern that is widely observed where she has earlier also dealt with matters lightly and went on to seek orders 24-48 hours prior. The court is the highest authority and has clearly indicated that the matter looks like an open and shut case of blackmail.”
Image source: IMDb
- Trending
__2023-10-20-8-8-35_thumbnail_2024-4-18-8-11-19_small.jpg)
